Health Library

Fasting glucose

Blood test · fasting

Also known as: Fasting plasma glucose, FPG, Fasting blood sugar

  1. Below the prediabetes range Below 100 mg/dL
  2. Prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose) 100 to 125 mg/dL
  3. Diabetes 126 mg/dL and above

Units and reference ranges differ between labs.

Cutoffs: American Diabetes Association, Standards of Care in Diabetes 2026

Fasting glucose is the sugar level in your blood after at least 8 hours with no calories. It is one of three tests used to diagnose prediabetes and diabetes. It captures a single moment, so a result near a cutoff is usually checked again.

What it tells you

  • Overnight, most of the sugar in your blood comes from the liver. Fasting glucose mainly shows how well insulin holds that output in check.
  • It is a snapshot, not an average. HbA1c, by contrast, reflects roughly the past two to three months.
  • Fasting glucose and the two-hour glucose tolerance test pick up partly different people, because they reflect different sides of how the body handles sugar.
  • Unless blood sugar is clearly very high, diagnosing diabetes takes two abnormal results. A result close to a cutoff is usually repeated in 3 to 6 months.
  • Risk does not switch on at 100. It rises gradually and climbs faster toward the top of the prediabetes range.
  • The World Health Organization and some other groups start prediabetes at 110 mg/dL. These bands follow the American Diabetes Association, which uses 100.

What can throw it off

  • Eating or drinking anything with calories within 8 hours can make it falsely high. Water is fine.
  • An afternoon draw tends to read lower than a morning one and can miss diabetes. A morning draw after an overnight fast is best.
  • If the blood sits before it is processed, the cells keep using sugar. The result can fall by about 5% to 7% each hour.
  • Illness, stress and recent exercise can shift it, usually upward.
  • Some medicines raise it, including steroids such as prednisone, statins, thiazide water pills, some HIV medicines and newer antipsychotics. Alcohol and smoking are also listed as factors.
  • Very high triglycerides, high bilirubin or red cells breaking open in the tube can interfere with some lab methods.
  • The same person's result varies by about 5% to 6% from day to day. A true 126 mg/dL can read anywhere from about 112 to 140.
  • When fasting glucose and HbA1c keep disagreeing, the cause is looked for before either is relied on.

Evidence

Diagnosing diabetes and prediabetes

Strong human evidenceCEBM Level 1a

Across 78 studies with over 180,000 people, a result of 126 mg/dL or higher wrongly flagged only about 4% of people without diabetes. But it found only about half the diabetes a glucose tolerance test picked up. It found only about a quarter of prediabetes.

Predicting diabetes

Strong human evidenceCEBM Level 1a

Across long-term studies, 5% to 10% of people with prediabetes developed diabetes each year. People with impaired fasting glucose were about four to five times as likely to develop diabetes as people with normal glucose.

Predicting heart disease and stroke

Strong human evidenceCEBM Level 1a

In 102 studies of nearly 700,000 people, heart risk did not change between about 70 and 100 mg/dL. Above 100, coronary heart disease risk rose modestly, by about 10% to 17%. In people without diabetes, fasting glucose did not improve heart risk prediction beyond standard risk factors.

Limits

  • It is one moment. It moves with timing, stress and sample handling, and it says nothing about blood sugar after meals.
  • A normal result does not rule out diabetes. It misses about half the cases a glucose tolerance test finds.
  • It does not measure insulin resistance. Blood sugar can stay in range while the body makes more and more insulin to hold it there.
  • Prevention trials showed benefit mainly when prediabetes was found by a glucose tolerance test. Benefit was not shown for a high fasting glucose alone.
  • On its own it is a weak heart-risk marker. It adds little to standard risk factors.

References

  1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Diabetes Care. 2026;49(Suppl 1):S27-S49 (Standards of Care, Section 2).
  2. Sacks DB, et al. Clin Chem. 2023;69:808-868.
  3. Tian J, et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2026;17:1846553.
  4. Gerstein HC, et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;78:305-312.
  5. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration; Sarwar N, et al. Lancet. 2010;375:2215-2222.

This page is for education only. It is not medical advice. Decisions about any treatment belong with a physician who knows your history.